Primary Research
The research methods in CareBridge were predominantly qualitative, designed to capture rich, contextual insights from those directly involved in orphanage management in Pakistan
of caregivers indicated that the high child-to-staff ratio forces them into a collective care model, significantly limiting their ability to provide individualized attention to each child
Research Methods
Semi-Structured Interviews: Researchers conducted 15 in-depth interviews with managers, caretakers, and teachers from several orphanages in Lahore. This flexible approach allowed participants to share detailed experiences and cover all critical aspects of orphanage operations.
Pilot Testing and Protocol Refinement: An initial phase of 5 pilot interviews revealed that the original questions lacked thematic focus. Based on this feedback, the interview protocol was refined—grouping similar topics and rephrasing questions—to enable a deeper exploration of issues like communication gaps, caregiver challenges, and individualized attention.
Ethical Considerations: Rigorous ethical protocols were followed, including obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and accommodating cultural sensitivities—especially when addressing sensitive topics related to caregiver stress and interpersonal dynamics.
of caregivers reported that they had not received any formal, context-specific professional training to effectively manage the unique emotional and behavioral challenges in their orphanages.
Initial Interview Protocol
Based on our secondary research and literature review, an initial protocol wad developed that aimed to gather general insights from caregivers regarding their roles and the daily workings of the orphanage. It was exploratory in nature, intended to identify a wide range of issues without deep thematic structuring.
Focused on broader questions with an exploratory nature to capture an overview of orphanage operations
Focused on basic operational procedures and day-to-day routines.
Covered general caregiving practices and overall impressions of the orphanage environment.
Included questions on logistical challenges such as resource availability and staffing ratios.
Sought insights on general caregiver experiences and perceptions without extensive probing into nuanced issues.
Pros:
Provided a wide-ranging overview of the orphanage setting, capturing diverse viewpoints from managers, caretakers, and teachers.
Helped identify initial areas of interest and potential gaps for further exploration.
Cons:
Lacked clear thematic grouping, leading to scattered responses and some ambiguity.
Questions were often too broad and not sufficiently probing, which limited deeper insights into specific issues like communication gaps or individualized care challenges.
The structure did not encourage detailed follow-up, leaving critical areas underexplored.
Revised Interview Protocol
Based on pilot feedback from five initial interviews, the revised protocol was restructured to address the shortcomings of the initial approach. It now emphasizes thematic clarity and deeper exploration of key issues, ensuring that each critical area is thoroughly examined.
Organized questions into distinct thematic sections (e.g., caregiving challenges, relationship dynamics, communication practices, and training needs).
Reworded questions for clarity and depth to better capture specific issues such as high caregiver-to-child ratios and reliance on older children.
Incorporated open-ended follow-up questions to encourage detailed narratives and richer descriptions of daily challenges.
Addressed sensitive topics, like communication barriers between predominantly female teachers and male administrators, with a culturally sensitive approach.
Incorporated on clear thematic sections and follow-up prompts to explore nuanced issues such as caregiver stress, communication gaps, and the need for context-specific training
How It Improved on the Initial Protocol:
The revised structure enabled interviewees to focus on specific topics sequentially, reducing ambiguity and improving the coherence of responses.
By grouping similar questions together, it allowed for deeper probing into each theme, uncovering nuanced insights about caregiver stress, communication gaps, and individualized care challenges.
The inclusion of follow-up prompts ensured that key issues were not only mentioned but explored in detail, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the operational challenges in Pakistani orphanages.
Initial Discoveries
During the initial interviews, there were some trends noticed in orphanages that were very apparent. Understanding these ideas through interviews and observations helped frame our research work in the future.
Orphanage Logistics
Stakeholders Involved
Administrators
These are the leadership of the orphanage that look at most high-level decisions. They include the founders of the orphanage and are usually the most passionate about it.
Children
These are the orphans living and studying at the orphanage.
Caretakers
The personnel at these orphanages handle everyday operational duties. This team includes educators and overall logistics coordinators.
The administrators, as leaders of the institution, cared significantly more in the outcomes of children than the caretakers did.